In the modern climate, a business of any real scale requires digital integration to help them interpret, gauge, read and store data that is relevant to their operation. Simply relying on old models that are not up to speed with current demands will mean you don’t get the best data analytics solutions.


The question then comes down to the software that can be utilised. In 2018, it is almost an accepted norm that any provider will be in tune with the cloud to store and save vast amounts of documentation and files, but what is best when comparing models such as Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan?


Operators want a brand that is remote, secure and purposely designed to ensure quality of performance on a range of tasks pertinent to their business.


It is ironic in this Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan software battle to draw in the most amount of business that one would be born out of the other. The latter was spawned from a handful of IBM developers who wanted to evolve the platform to something that was more in tune with the cloud and recent trends in technology.


This is a commercial friction for the Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan

packages that has taken place for a few years now and whilst many enterprises will have no knowledge or care about the competition between these two brands, it is worthwhile reading their assets and points of difference.


By identifying these features, owners and developers can run their operation with a greater sense of purpose and efficiency.


Let us examine the Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan battle for ourselves.

Functionality Fundamentals


For Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan functionality, the former model champions a separation between input tables and the central dashboard. It also happens to use a unique script language that is different from the competitors. For Anaplan, operators that have a more general sense of the application find it to be user-friendly through a simplified interface. If you are searching for added features to cater to your unique model, then Cognos is for you, although you will not find any connectors to an external application in this setting.

Speed of Performance


There is little doubt that when it comes to the capacity of reading data and making changes in real time for the Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan battle, the latter comes out on top. This cloud-based technology is streets ahead of the competition when it comes to performance speed, whereas the Cognos model cannot guarantee that every single calculation is made in real time.


Such a result is due to the fact that the processes are automated, requiring user intervention of the system to guarantee a real time outlay. Some professionals have cited a slight delay with the Anaplan model only when it comes to a large model that requires a series of very complex calculations, but those examples are few and far between and still leaves the brand streets ahead of the competition.

The Overall Cost of the Package


The Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan battle for cost is won by the younger brand in most cases. A user license is required for each application and some of the larger-scale enterprises that incorporate models with greater complexity have actually found Cognos to be cheaper in the long-term. This will ultimately come down to the digital footprint you leave, as the data volume is the ultimate determining factor for overall cost.



Take the Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan software battle at face value. There won’t be any one metric that defines who ultimately comes out on top because each business from every sector on a large or small scale will interpret their offerings differently. The ideal prism to view the Cognos TM1 vs. Anaplan conflict is through your own reading in the context of your business model. Weigh up the pro’s and con’s, speak with professionals and make a decision on the data.